Cover of: Justice, democracy, and the jury | James J. Gobert

Justice, democracy, and the jury

  • 253 Pages
  • 2.99 MB
  • 6766 Downloads
  • English
by
Ashgate/Dartmouth , Aldershot, Brookfield, Vt
Jury., Justice., Democ
StatementJames Gobert.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsK2292 .G63 1997
The Physical Object
Paginationx, 253 p. ;
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL667785M
ISBN 101855212633
LC Control Number97013531

Justice, Democracy, and the Jury book. Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. Within this text, James Gobert looks at the role and func Ratings: 0.

Get this from a library. Justice, democracy, and the jury. [James J Gobert] -- Within this text, James Gobert looks at the role and function of the jury and the individual juror.

He examines these from a number of perspectives: legal, historical, political, psychological and. Justice, Democracy and the Jury is an attempt to place the jury within an historical, political and philosophical framework and to analyze the decision-making processes at work on a jury.

The book also examines whether the model of the jury can be adapted to other decision-making contexts and whether ‘citizens juries’ can be used to revive. Justice, Democracy and the Jury is an attempt to place the jury within a historical, political and philosophical framework, and to analyse the decision-making processes at work on a jury.

The book also examines whether the model of the jury can be adapted to other decision-making contexts and whether "citizens juries" can be used to revive a Cited by: 4. "The Jury and Democracy is an ambitious bookit includes far more data, and suggestive arguments on the connections between the jury system, public engagement, and democracy than are possible to summarize here.

It will be of interest to scholars of criminal justice and the sociology of law, as well as those more broadly concerned with Cited by:   Justice, Democracy and the Jury by James J. Gobert,available at Book Depository with free delivery : James J.

Gobert. Get this from a library. Justice, Democracy and the Jury. [James Gobert] -- First published inthis volume recognises that on trial in every criminal case heard by a jury is not only the defendant but the democratic premise that ordinary citizens are capable of sitting.

Justice, Democracy and the Jury is an attempt to place the jury within a historical, political and philosophical framework, and to analyse the decision-making processes at work on a jury.

The book also Justice whether the model of the jury can be adapted to other decision-making contexts and whether "citizens juries" can be used to revive a.

Justice, Democracy and the Jury. DOI link for Justice, Democracy and the Jury. Justice, Democracy and the Jury book. Justice, Democracy and the Jury. DOI link for Justice, Democracy and the Jury. Justice, Democracy and the Jury book. By James Gobert. Edition 1st Edition. First Published eBook Published 4 June Pub.

location London Author: James Gobbert. While restorative justice programs and participatory policy forums such as citizens' juries have become attractive to reformers, traditional juries have suffered a and the jury book and troubling decline.

Punishment, Participatory Democracy, and the Jury advocates a broader role for jurors in and the jury book criminal courts and more widespread use of jury by: This magisterial book explores fascinating cases from American history to show how juries remain the heart of our system of criminal justice - and an essential element of our democracy.

No other institution of government rivals the jury in placing power so directly in the hands of citizens. Jeffrey Abramson draws upon his own background as both a lawyer and a political theorist to capture the 3/5(2).

This book has been cited by the following publications. the relationship between justice, democracy and impartiality queried and the relationship between justice, democracy and the common good examined. Opinion Leaders, Independence and Condorcet's Jury Theorem.

Theory and Decision 36. Book published. In latewe combined all of our project’s findings in a book by Oxford University Press, The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation.

You can order copies online directly from Oxford University Press or at The early reviews say nice things, which we can. The Jury and Democracy How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation John Gastil, E. Pierre Deess, Philip J. Weiser, and Cindy Simmons. First book to present strong empirical evidence linking jury service and increased civic participation; Demonstrates the impact jury service has on even the most disengaged citizens.

“The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” John Jay, 1st Chief Justice U.S.

Download Justice, democracy, and the jury EPUB

supreme Court, “The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts.” Samuel Chase, U.S. supreme Court Justice,Signer of the unanimous DeclarationFile Size: KB. Justifying the Jury: Reconciling Justice, Equality, and Democracy - Volume Issue 3 - MELISSA SCHWARTZBERGAuthor: Melissa Schwartzberg.

This essay will explain how the jury system and democracy are interrelated. The ordinary public benefited from the criminal justice system in the UK, because the jury system plays a vital role therefore unjust and political leaders cannot abuse the criminal justice system.

The speeches and dialogues Socrates makes in this book raises a. Focusing contemporary democratic theory on the neglected topic of punishment, Punishment, Participatory Democracy, and the Jury argues for increased civic engagement in criminal justice as an antidote to the American penal state.

Albert W. Dzur considers how the jury, rather than merely expressing unreflective public opinion, may serve as a participatory institution that gathers and utilizes. Lacey assumes that involving the public in shaping criminal justice ineluctably leads to knee-jerk punitiveness.

She entirely overlooks the book’s fundamental distinction between making criminal justice policy wholesale and adjudicating deserved punishment at the retail level, in individual cases.

9 Wholesale policies are tainted by the media’s sensationalistic stories, co-opted by. Albert Dzur’s Punishment, Participatory Democracy, and the Jury is a book that contributes to several ongoing debates among social scientists and legal scholars.

As a work of empirical democratic theory, the book encourages a rethinking of how we have come to manage our increasingly bureaucratized and professionalized political institutions.

De La Démocratie en Amérique (French pronunciation: [dəla demɔkʁasi ɑ̃n‿ameˈʁik]; published in two volumes, the first in and the second in ) is a classic French text by Alexis de title translates as On Democracy in America, but English translations are usually simply entitled Democracy in the book, Tocqueville examines the democratic revolution Author: Alexis de Tocqueville.

In every republic, state or monarchy, it is constitutional adoption and practical implementation of the Citizen-Juror’s powers and duties in common law Trial by Jury to judge the justice of law and every part of the acts of law enforcement, which define and comprise the basis of legitimate government and democracy, sine qua non.

Jury nullification (US), jury equity (UK), or a perverse verdict (UK) generally occurs when members of a criminal trial jury believe that a defendant is guilty, but choose to acquit the defendant anyway because the jurors also believe that the law itself is unjust, that the prosecutor has misapplied the law in the defendant's case, or that the potential punishment for breaking the law is too.

Focusing contemporary democratic theory on the neglected topic of punishment, this book argues for increased civic engagement in criminal justice as an antidote to the American penal state.

It considers how the jury may serve as a participatory institution that gathers and utilizes citizen’s juridical capabilities rather than merely expressing unreflective public opinion.

To some extent, this book became the focal point of the current wave of interest in the jury system, much like Kalven and Zeisel's "The American Jury" did in the 's. The updated preface appears to be the result of the interactions and dialogues Prof.

Abramson developed with other serious jury researchers as a result of these experiences/5(7). Why is jury service important to our democracy. Does it promote civic participation.

by Mavis Duncan-Dyer How a person thinks about jury service is how a person conceptualizes democracy. The role of the jury is to provide unbiased views or resolution to evidence presented in a case in a court of Size: KB. Justice, democracy and the jury. Add to My Bookmarks Export citation.

Type Book Author(s) Gobert, James J. Date c Publisher Ashgate Pub place Aldershot ISBNPreview. This item appears on. List: Understanding Criminal Justice Section: Juries. The jury, underutilized today and overlooked by restorative justice advocates, is a tool for fostering public moral deliberation inside and outside the courtroom.

This chapter makes clear, however, that the co-creation of justice and co-responsibility for punishment fostered by the jury as a force of rational disorganization are different from.

Details Justice, democracy, and the jury PDF

5 Cf. Albert Weale, Democracy (New York: St Martin’s Press, ), p. 6 I borrow this description from Richard J. Arneson, ‘Democracy is not Intrinsically Just’, in Goodin, Dowding, Pateman (eds) Justice and Democracy, pp.

7 Unless we stipulate (implausibly in my view) that the only requirement of justice is Size: KB. Long, Jacqueline.

Description Justice, democracy, and the jury PDF

Gender, Democracy, and the Justice of Athena’s Vote to Acquit Orestes. Text & Presentation,Retrieved from Loyola eCommons, Classical Studies: Faculty Publications and Other Works, This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Loyola eCommons.

ItAuthor: Jacqueline Long. Instead, the jury – particularly the criminal jury – has illustrated the logic of imperfect procedural justice, in which there is an independent criterion for a fair outcome, but the procedure only fallibly achieves it.

4 In particular, scholars sympathetic to epistemic justifications File Size: KB.The makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court has come under intense criticism in recent years after two Trump-nominated justices joined the bench.

Senate Republicans confirmed Neil Gorsuch in after.The trial, and specifically the jury trial, is, as Alexis de Tocqueville understood, one essential incubator of democracy. The jury trial is the only space in which most people will ever be forced to sit in judgment of their fellow citizens and declare them innocent or guilty; or, in a civil trial, to judge whether one party’s wrong requires.